More Awareness less Regulation

I wonder what the purchasers of this pesticide think? In the past, when studies show a certain product to be toxic, a Governmental regulation is enforced against the manufacture, yet I would question, if there wasn’t a Governmental regulation against the manufacture, stopping the manufacture from producing the product, would the product still be purchased? Even knowing the ineffectiveness or toxic of the studied product, would there be a customer base? Would people still purchase the product? I believe my question is yes that there would be a customer base for.

As with our Supply and Demand economic model, the product will continue to be purchased and used. Instead of attacking the manufacture and setting regulation against, should it be taken into consideration why a toxic product was designed in the first place?

Maybe it is our economic model needing adjusting. Maybe it is the base, which our economic system was framed, needing tweaking? Maybe the whole structured social system needs tweaking?

This is what I believe; it is the whole structured social system harming and destroying my nature around me. I wouldn't enforce this idea or set regulation, because I don't know if it to be truly true indicating that I know a certain truth, which, I believe, a truth to anything can't be known.