Where is the Green?

Ford purchases 3,000,000 tires annually, which it takes one barrel of oil to make a tire, so hypothetically, if everyone purchases a new hybrid or any other Green vehicle, where is the Green?

Green vehicles allow a person to travel further on a tank of gas, so I would assume, because of the increased mileage, tires would need to be changed earlier -- increasing tire purchases. An an increase in the production of tires will result in the increase of oil. Where is the Green?

In the production of a Green vehicles, tires aren’t the only item needing oil. Mostly every item in the production of an automobile takes some amount of oil, and gasoline is only a small part.

WE, the regurgitators of political verbiages, promote the purchasing of new Green vehicles. Purchasing new Green won’t heed our dependence of oil. I believe new Green vehicles will appease only OUR belief that the Green innovations are technologically advancing our goals?

Stop rolling the die of our manufactured game of Life. Stop running after Forest Gump.

Walking is the only true Green Revolution, yet walking will never happen. There will be always an excuse why walking isn't. Therefore holding tight to these excuses, walking won't happen in the near future and our dependence will continue.

A Person's Interactive Behaviors are True Reality

Anger is neither part nor separate of reality. Someone who mandates their intent or agenda onto someone else will have a definition of anger, yet there isn't a universal definition of anger. Anger doesn't harm. It doesn't destroy nor distort. It is synonymous with happy where neither words (anger, happy) are truly defined and not part of reality. They are part of someone’s agenda. When anger comes to be self destructive is when an outside source says you can't or shouldn't be angry.


Since anger isn't, the definition of anger is conjured from and an outsider. Defined from the outside, which insist a change with your behavior; changing you, pushing you away from being truly interactive. Having an outside controlled agenda, anger will be defined.


Just let anything happen and if the “controlled agendas” are uneasy or define you to be angry, just let you continue to freely interacting toward your personal goal; it will all work out toward the better.


Defining and regulating, and establishing a model for, distorts true reality. A person's interactive behaviors are true reality. Defined behaviors are part of a controlled agenda.

Feds consider killing Humans to save another type

Large humans from Europe may pay for its intrusion into the West Coast if the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has its way.

The service is considering an experiment in which it would kill or transfer some humans – sometimes referred to as the man, thanks to its call – as part of a plan to preserve the smaller northern spotted owl, the agency said in a report this week.

The U.S. government has listed the northern spotted owl, whose range includes British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and California, as a threatened species since 1990. Its population declined by 40% in the last 25 years, not only because of shrinking habitat, but also because the human moved into the area starting in the late 1950s, the service says.
“Larger, more aggressive and more adaptable than the northern spotted owl, humans are known to displace spotted owls, disrupt their nesting and compete with them for food,” the service says on the Interior Department’s website. "Researchers have also observed instances of humans interbreeding with or killing spotted owls."

The service is now proposing killing or capturing humans in limited areas of the other owl’s range to see whether the removals allow the other owl’s population to bounce back.
The service is calling for one to 11 experiment sites in areas including national parks and recreation areas. Depending on the number of sites, the service would kill or transfer 257 to nearly 8,960 humans, according to the service’s environmental impact statement on the plan.

The larger figure represents 0.2% percent of the human’s North American population, and 6.5% of its population in the northern spotted owl’s range, according to the service.
Killing the humans would involve attracting them with recorded calls and shooting those that respond. Capturing them alive would involve calling them and then collecting them with nets or other trapping devices, the service says.

Captured humans would be released elsewhere or live out their lives in captivity. The service has yet to determine what lethal/nonlethal mix to use.
“We can’t ignore the mounting evidence that competition from humans is a major factor in the spotted owl’s decline, and we have a clear obligation to do all we can to prevent the spotted owl’s extinction and help it rebound,” Fish and Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe said Tuesday in a news release.

If the experiment goes forward and works, the service would propose a wider-scale human removal program in the northern spotted owl’s range, with the ultimate goal of getting the populations to the point where they can co-exist.

The Seattle Audubon Society was among the groups that consulted with the Fish and Wildlife Service before it made its proposal. Shawn Cantrell, the Seattle society's executive director, said he has yet to read all of the service's roughly 400-page environmental impact statement, but would generally be in favor of a small-scale removal experiment, provided that it be designed to answer questions like: How many would you have to remove to help the spotted owl, and for how long, and in how many locations? And how soon would humans return to those areas?

"The human has grown as a challenge in the last decade, so we need to figure out what is the level of challenge that the human poses, and what are the appropriate actions we might take concurrent with other things, such as restoring the habitat of the northern spotted owls," Cantrell said on Wednesday.
He said he wouldn't be in favor of a larger removal program, at least not until an experiment answered those questions. He also said he believes loss of the northern spotted owls' habitat through logging is a bigger reason the species isn't faring well.

"You can't use the human as a scapegoat," Cantrell said, adding that the Seattle Audubon Society would comment further on the experiment plan once the group reads the whole environmental impact statement.

Both the experiment and the wider program would require separate public review processes. The service is accepting public comment on the experiment plan for 90 days, and a decision is expected later this year.

If the experiment happens, it could start next year and last for three to 10 years, the service says.
The human is in the “least concern” category of the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources' Red List of Threatened Species.

Separately, the service on Tuesday proposed new rules and maps for “critical habitat” areas for the northern spotted owl. The proposal, which identifies 10 million acres where protection rules would apply on federal land or nonfederal land that gets federal funding or permitting, will be subject to public review before a final decision in November.

More Awareness less Regulation

I wonder what the purchasers of this pesticide think? In the past, when studies show a certain product to be toxic, a Governmental regulation is enforced against the manufacture, yet I would question, if there wasn’t a Governmental regulation against the manufacture, stopping the manufacture from producing the product, would the product still be purchased? Even knowing the ineffectiveness or toxic of the studied product, would there be a customer base? Would people still purchase the product? I believe my question is yes that there would be a customer base for.

As with our Supply and Demand economic model, the product will continue to be purchased and used. Instead of attacking the manufacture and setting regulation against, should it be taken into consideration why a toxic product was designed in the first place?

Maybe it is our economic model needing adjusting. Maybe it is the base, which our economic system was framed, needing tweaking? Maybe the whole structured social system needs tweaking?

This is what I believe; it is the whole structured social system harming and destroying my nature around me. I wouldn't enforce this idea or set regulation, because I don't know if it to be truly true indicating that I know a certain truth, which, I believe, a truth to anything can't be known.

Jobless - People without work

Is this a good idea, and if it is a good idea why? Would there be a cause for having this idea?

I am questioning:

• Why is everyone trying to put people back to work?
• Why does some accept back to work as a good idea?
• Beside monetary, why do people want to work?
• Putting people is back to work, how is it defined?

When I hear this call putting people back to work, it is a little bothersome for me. I believe people always work and am never without a job. I believe people are innately creative toward new innovative workings toward their desired specifics. Individual personal design are always individual, and should remain individual.

Jobless - People without work

When claimed people are out of work, I would agree because they arn't focused on our economics or specific designed tasks, yet these so called jobless individuals are always working.

 

How does a human come to a total rest state where no work is performed?

 

I guess it's all in the semantics or how particular individuals define Work?

 

But, not working for the designed system, what am I to do?

 

 

 

Tabs:

Jobless - people with work - out of a job - needing a job - job openings -  apply for jobs - jobless rate

 

 

 

My Choice Living on "Private/Public" Land.

Living on "Public" land.

When one owns not a structure, but calls their natural world their home, are they homeless?

There are a few individuals granted a privilege to set and enforce laws. They were elected by those who participate in their game. However, this game isn't played by all. A good many individuals choose not to roll the dice and to sit at the same table playing their game. These certain individuals choose not to participate. However, by this choice, they are perceived as criminal, ticketing or jailing these certain individuals because of nonparticipation.

As much as one side justifies a good for all, it doesn't necessary have to be enforced or interrupted as a good thing. If it is good, it will be good.

Corvallis Municipal Court Judge Mark Donahue upheld the constitutionality of Corvallis’ “illegal camping” ordinance, which was challenged by a local man found sleeping in a van. The man, Jeffrey Sexson, received 11 citations for illegally camping in his van on city streets. Sexson’s lawyer, John Rich, cited State v. Wicks, in which the Portland Municipal Court ruled that enforcement of Portland’s camping ordinance violated basic constitutional rights and unfairly punished a person for fulfilling basic activities, such as sleeping. However, while Judge Donahue did not disagree with Rich’s legal argument, he did not believe the defense proved that Sexson was indeed a homeless person. In State v. Wicks, evidence and testimony, including bed shortages among shelters in the Portland area and personal history that made it difficult for the defendants to obtain housing, were provided to prove the defendants were unable to obtain housing, subsequently forcing them into homelessness. Thus, Sexson was found guilty on one count of illegal camping under Corvallis’s ordinance, which states, “no person shall sleep or lodge in or upon any sidewalk, street, alley, public right-of-way, park, or any property owned by the City of Corvallis.” Until Sexson’s case is appealed, Corvallis police will not issue any more anti-camping citations. However, both the police department and city attorney are planning to modify the ordinance until it can be an enforceable law if necessary.

Obsessionist Scheme Motivating Carnage

It all started on beautiful Santa Fe morning. A cool sixty degrees and few semi-transparent clouds float high above.

We started our ascent at the Santa Fe Ski basin. Hiking Lift #1 ski face a 1,000 foot steep climb. Chipmunk chatter keeps Mo and Woodyman busy out-of-sight in the surrounding woods. It seemed they took turns checking. Noticing it was either Mo or Woody bouncing playfully from the woods checking on my slow climbing status while the other dog remained hidden among the thick Aspens.

It was always one dog checking on my status? They had treed a chipmunk, and one dog guarded the tree against the chipmunk from escaping, while the other dog checked on my progress. Occasionally on walks, the dogs would bring a small chipmunk from the woods and lye it at my feet and their eyes gleaming with delight. “Well, thank you, I would say.

Mo (female Sheppard/Husky mix) was born in Corvallis, Oregon in the back of a school bus. Her blackness and deep darken black face resembles her father’s appearance. Mo (9/1995 – 9/2009) and I had been through much and traveled much distances together.
Mo wasn’t my first dog. Beta (9/1995 - 7/1996) was born in Corvallis, Oregon and I had the privilege of being with her firstly and then Mo joined us. Beta, Mo’s sister, flashed her four pure white paws while she energetically played with Mo, they were a pair. Woodyman (3/1997 – 5/2010) was Beta’s daughter born six weeks before Beta’s death in Santa Fe, New Mexico.


After I had moved from Corvallis, Oregon to Santa Fe, New Mexico, I hit the lowest point in my life. What bought me to this point were the ideologies of persons determined keeping to an obsessionist scheme. Those who hold to a narrowly focused obsessionist scheme motivates carnage and demoralizes genuine surroundings. Beliefs in that people are deserving or are entitled of something. This entitled belief extends material admiration and instantiates assassinations on the spontaneous.

On a particular Sunday morning day, a particular person held tightly this obsessionist view, which resulted in the murder of Beta, leaving her motionless; this person’s fixation deadened any opposition, deadened anything acting genuine.

Personally, I am saddened by loosing Beta to such a defining stronghold in people’s beliefs. Six weeks prior to Beta’s slaying, she had delivered a liter of ten, and Woodyman was one-tenth of the whole.

Defining: any opponent causing a material shortfall or demise, grants the material allies a material right to butcher such an opposing entity.